Star Wars Fanon

Star Wars Fanon:Deletion page

44,111pages on
this wiki

The Star Wars Fanon deletion page is the page on Star Wars Fanon to discuss the deletion of articles, templates and other entries on the Wiki. For the majority of necessary deletions, a user may simply add {{Delete}} to a page when necessary. However, if a user disagrees with the speedy deletion or if a user wants to propose the deletion of an entry instead, the user may place {{DeleteTalk}} instead to create a discussion page.

To create a discussion page, one simply has to click on the link given by the latter template, or create the page manually as [[Star Wars Fanon:Deletion page/Article name]]. Then, the user formally sets up their reasoning for the proposed deletion, a voting section, and a discussion section. All deletion discussions must be categorized under Category: Deletion discussions, and be added the list of discussions at the bottom of this page.

Nobody may remove the template from the page proposed for deletion until the discussion is over; generally, a discussion and voting is held open for only one week, but it may close earlier than that if some form of consensus is reached throughout the discussion. Users should not violate the terms of the consensus, which would be either the verdict reached through voting or an agreement reached throughout a discussion.

Users may nominate any articles, images, templates, or categories they deem necessary to delete for a deletion discussion.

Deletion discussions

Below is a list of deletion voting currently going on. Closed discussions can be viewed in the archives.

Category:Nathan Wojlaker ( history - links - Wojlaker logs)

Support (4)

  1. I'd go for deleting this category: category pages, as the name suggests, would serve to catalogize content, whereas the author would intend to use this category in places where a link to the Nathan Wojlaker article would suffice. TK-999 (Talk) 21:13, June 26, 2015 (UTC)
  2. For insufficient category breadth; per below discussion, it really can't be a category of more than one. SakarosTalk 21:29, June 26, 2015 (UTC)
  3. As the one who first placed the tag, I concur. The author has added a number of extraneous categories of this nature which add no real value to the categorization of the wiki. Firedance 22:34, June 26, 2015 (UTC)
  4. I don't see any reason for a character to have their own separate category. Alexander of Volzhsky



I have not found anything wrong about the category I created. The only thing I can think is wrong is that it's subcategory in Barsen'thor. However, the Nathan Wojlaker is a place that expands to other article for the Nathan Wojlaker article. So it would have the same catergories as the article. As I have seen I have done no relative harm to others except posting that sub-category. I would try to offend or harm anyone's beliefs they do what they do on the wiki. The Wiki network is a place where people can unwind and share Ideas. I would hate to ruin that for anyone.Unsigned comment by Annabethlover1652 (talkcontribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

  • What other articles do you envision being in the category? It seems to me that it might be one thing if it was "Articles in the Nathan Wojlaker universe" (might or might not survive deletion review, but it's certainly broader), whereas a category called "Nathan Wojlaker" really can't reasonable include any other articles. SakarosTalk 16:38, June 26, 2015 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki