Getting Started Create a character Create an event Create a planet Create a ship Posting fan fiction Image uploading Fanon Good Articles Featured Articles Characters Galactic Republic Imperials Jedi Mandalorians Separatists Sith Read more Events Assassinations Battles Bombings Campaigns Holidays Wars Read more Organizations Companies Criminals Force-based Governments Read more Planets Core Deep Core Inner Rim Outer Rim Unknown Regions Read more Read more Fan Fiction Featured Fiction Featured Fiction library Nominate a story Requirements Novellas Novels Short Stories Read more Community About Star Wars Fanon Café Fanfic Community Forum Writing Center Fanon and Fan Fiction Announcements Star Wars Fanon Discussion Consensus Track Guidelines Article Guidelines Image Policy Editing Guidelines Read more Live Chat Chat Guidelines Join Chat Tutorials Image uploading Posting fan fiction Writing featured articles Read more
119 Posts

Filter Posts Reset

Categories

Sort By

  • All
  • Following

Archivist adjustment

Hello everyone. I have an idea.
I've noticed that there's been a dearth of activity in the fan-fiction world on this website, and I thought of something that might help to shake things up a bit, add some incentive for people to dust off their old stories and post some new ones, as well as encourage more featured work participation. The gist is that the term "Archivist" would become less of an obligation and more of a status symbol. It would be a recognition that this individual knows how to write a good story, and thus could help other people write their own stories and help decide what's a good story.
Links: featured work page and featured work nomination page

Proposal
Part 1: Any user who has written two or more featured works is automatically granted the title of Archivist. (This would grant the following users the Archivist title: Jedi Master 76, MPK, Sakaros, Tesh Vohore)
Part 2: Item 5 of the Featured Work qualifications on FW page amended to say "It must receive at least 2 votes from the Archivists and 3 votes from the community to become a featured work." from "It must receive at least (2/3) votes from the Archivists and 5 votes from the community to become a featured work." This will make it consistent with the FW nom page, which currently conflicts with it.
Part 3: Update all "2/3 Archivist" vote requirements to say that 2 Archivists are sufficient to override an objection or remove a nomination. I would be fine bumping this up to 3 if more Archivists became active, but I feel that if 2 Archivists agree than objection is not an issue or that a nomination shouldn't be there, then it should be removed. I will monitor this closely for abuse, but I largely trust the judgment of the people we'd be adding.
I don't know how we do consensus on these new boards, but I'll check in on this periodically and gauge consensus two weeks from now. Cheers!
Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 16:03, October 14, 2015 (UTC)
0 32

Galactic calender changes in Legends/New Expanded Universe: Should we change our formatting?

Recently, Wookieepedia voted to redo the formatting for its year articles, removing the comma in four-digit years (example, "3,956 BBY" was changed to "3956 BBY"). It was a little startling at first, hearing about it, but the more it showed the more it made sense—not leastwise in how most real-world calenders work. So, I propose that we do the same thing here on Star Wars Fanon, that is to say, reworking our BBY/ABY articles so that they drop the comma.
Per a suggestion by Brandon Rhea, this should not deter users from using a pipelink to leave the comma in, should they desire (e.g., [[3956 BBY|3,956 BBY]]).
If this motion is adopted, it will mean a lot of grunt work (possibly done by a bot, but there's no reason why regular users can't do it), but I'm more than happy to work on it.
Admittedly this is somewhat of a minor issue for a Consensus Track, but I also wanted to test out the viability of using the Forum extension for holding a site-wide discussion such as this one. Since I am not aware of a vote-tallying mechanism, perhaps a simple "Yes" or "No" should be the first word of any reply posts, followed by whatever reason one chooses to add. Once a sufficient amount of time has passed, an administrator or the starter of the Consensus Track can count up the votes and, if sufficient consensus has been achieved, make the appropriate changes.
This Consensus Track thread will last for one week, ending on 9 September 2014 at 9:45 EDT (02:45 UTC).
0 3